California Hour Lunch Law

If you work at least 3 and a half hours a day, you are entitled to rest. If you work more than 6 hours, you are entitled to a second rest. If you work more than 10 hours, you are entitled to a third rest. Thank you Joshua, and I agree with your comments, but I still wonder if an employee and an employer can agree that an employee can take their lunch break beyond their first 5 hours of the day (100% of the employee`s choice that the employer accepts). It would never be abandoned, only postponed to a later date in their shift. Some staff members just like to eat later or meet friends later etc. and we would love to welcome you if allowed. Meal breaks must be taken before the end of the fifth hour of a shift. For example, if workers check in at 8 a.m., they must leave for lunch before 12:59 p.m. I work outdoors in the construction industry in Palm Springs. It`s going to be incredibly hot, so let`s start as soon as possible.

All my colleagues don`t want to take lunch breaks as it causes more physical tension than just working through our 8 with breaks. Sitting and cooling off somewhere for 30 minutes just to have to get up and out in the sun is incredibly exhausting and pushes the end of our day further into the hottest part of the day. Why are we forced to take a lunch break in the “Land of the Free”? It should be my right to vote, is there absolutely no way to protect me and my employer so that we do not have to? The only way to forego an unpaid meal period is if you work a 6-hour shift, otherwise you will have to start your meal period BEFORE the 5th. Take an hour of work if you work an 8-hour shift to avoid a meal penalty, keep in mind that some employers may take disciplinary action for several hours of missed or late meals, especially if the company manual states that it is a violation and management approval is required. My manager requires employees to work 6 days a week, 14 hours on weekdays and 8 hours on Saturdays. and it tells employees that if they don`t work that overtime, some temporary workers won`t be hired. I work in a grocery store and tend to work a total of 6 to 7 hours 6 days a week. I have been working here for 3 years and now I wonder how I was treated, how others tell me that I am being abused. You can let me work 6 days a week just to give me one day off a week. And secondly, they give me my break at my 1 hour and a half for 10 minutes, and then tell me that I have to have lunch at my work of 2 1/2-3 hours so they don`t have to worry about breaks and lunch later. Our lunch lasts 30 minutes, then we don`t have any extra breaks after our lunch ends. Is this type of processing legal or even fair? Is it legal for my boss to require that all my breaks be “on duty” and that I be supposed to work, whether I am on break or not? Note that I get a paid lunch because I need to be on duty, but I never have the rest breaks continuously at the time they should be; I`m expected to take them when I can get them, which is rare that I don`t have to do something for my job For every day of work where you don`t provide an employee with a meal break when needed, you owe the employee an hour`s extra pay at the employee`s regular rate.

The hour of extra pay is a salary due to the employee. Employees have up to three years to claim unpaid wages. As a general rule, as far as possible, the rest period should be in the middle of each four-hour working time. In an eight-hour day, a rest break usually falls on both sides of the meal break. Although this is the general rule, there is no absolute obligation to grant a rest period before mealtime. But to work in a 6-hour shift, you need to bring food to eat during your 10-minute break. And maybe you`ll find times when you can have a snack or something like that while you`re at work. Do employees tend to start their day a few minutes before the start of their shift? Does this cause them to rush to lunch at the end of their fifth hour of work? Benyamini recommends creating a buffer of at least 10 or 15 minutes so that employees do not bump into the clock. I have a question. My company has a work schedule of 4 to 10 shifts.

We stamp at 15:25 and from 14:00 to 14:10. But our company only gives us 2 breaks and 1 lunch. Is this a legal reason why I thought a little over 10 hours, even though it`s a minute you should rest again? And when we talk about it after a year of work. They started hitting us in front of our mark of 10 so they didn`t have to give us that extra break. My friend mainly works 5-6 hour shifts, but sometimes if the store has to close later without warning, he works 7 hours at a time. And whenever this happens, his manager corrects the timesheet so that he does not get overtime for the violation of food. Who should he turn to if this continues? Can an employee work an 8-hour shift and take meal breaks accordingly, plus paid rest breaks after their lunch break, close to the time they are eliminated? We want to prevent employees from taking their PAID REST 15 minutes before eradicating without getting into trouble with the law? Any suggestion, I have always understood that the law must be an EMPLOYER, but does not have to PRESCRIBE that employees take a PAID REST of 10 minutes during working hours, it is a use or a loss, unlike the FOOD BREAK, these are mandatory or we pay a penalty . HELP for more details please??? I would say you have the right to lunch.