F 6. A`s father told him at dinner, “If you get 100 points on your exam tomorrow, I`ll buy you a motorcycle.” Scored 100 points, but the father later refused. A sues his father Here are some legal justification questions about preparing for the CLAT exam. These questions are selected from the previous year`s CLAT questionnaires. Read more: Short tips to pass the CLAT exam the first time Legal aptitude questions are meant to test your legal thinking, research skills, and problem-solving skills. The section on legal fitness is divided into three sections: Force majeure regulations often treat natural disasters such as hurricanes, floods and earthquakes as “force majeure”. Other events covered may include war, terrorism, riots, fires, medical epidemics or due to applicable laws or regulations. Generally speaking, the courts have interpreted the term “force majeure” as an event that cannot be foreseen or controlled by either party. A force majeure clause applies in the context of ongoing contractual arrangements, while an EAW clause or a material adverse change (MAC) clause applies to the diversification of risks in transactions prior to their conclusion or conclusion. The pandemic and its consequences, such as government measures, are a type of event covered by a force majeure clause, but its impact on the affected party`s ability to fulfill its contractual obligations may vary depending on the terms of the contract. It is customary for force majeure clauses to indicate the effects that the event or circumstances in question must have for the clause to be triggered.
It may, for example, be informed of the event or circumstances that “prevented”, “impeded” or “delayed” performance. These conditions require different performance effects before a party can rely on these clauses. In other words, force majeure and MAC clauses are an exception to what would otherwise be treated as breach of contract. Following the CLAT preparation tips will help you quickly resolve the questions for the next exam. The issue of obscenity has long irritated courts in India and abroad. The intriguing question has always been the same, that is, what should be the standards for calling something obscene in the eyes of the law? In the United Kingdom, as early as 1868, the Court adopted the Hicklin test in Regina v. Hicklin (1868 L.R. 2 Q.B. 360) and noted that: “The test of obscenity is whether the tendency of the case accused of obscenity is to corrupt and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands such publication may fall.‖ Hicklin`s test postulated that a publication should be judged on the basis of isolated passages in a work, that are taken out of context and judged according to their apparent influence on the most vulnerable individuals. Readers, such as children or dumb adults.
However, this criterion was subsequently rejected by most courts. Indian courts have issued numerous judgments that obscenity must be judged in the context of contemporary social mores, the current socio-moral attitude of the community, and the prevailing norms of community acceptance/vulnerability to the issues in dispute. [For example, in Ranjit D. Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1965 SC 881; Chandrakant Kalyandas Kakodar v. State of Maharashtra 1969 (2) SCC 687, etc.] These judgments suggested that the concept of obscenity would change over time and that what might have been obscene at one time would not be considered obscene at a later date‖ would not be obscene at a later date. This has been called the “community standards test‖. In Bobby Art International & Ors. v.
Om Pal Singh Hoon (1996) 4 SCC 1, the Court upheld the Community Standards test that the full message and context of the scene, company, offending image, etc., must be examined to determine whether the alleged material is obscene or not. Find the best answer while resolving CLAT`s legal adequacy section. You should look for the best answer, not the ideal answer, in the CLAT survey. Let us take the same facts in the case of self-defence. One principle and four to five questions related to that principle could be given, or several principles and questions could be given to resolve CLAT`s legal reasoning section. The Legal Reasoning section of the CLAT exam assesses your legal knowledge, problem-solving and research skills. Legal knowledge includes: Legal knowledge is based on the static knowledge that one must have beforehand or learn during exam preparation. There are three areas that we can discuss, and you need to know them. In this legal justification or legal suitability, we will discuss the legal justification you need to pass the section on legal suitability of all CLAT entrance exams and other India law entrance exams. This article deals specifically with legal reasoning and the strategy to master it. Finally, you need to start reading newspapers and magazines in order to be regularly informed about the legal field, for example in relation to current events in the legal field. So you need to start reading newspapers and magazines regularly to keep up with the CLAT exam.
4. Emotional Trap When solving CLAT legal issues, facts could be provided that could interfere with your emotional thinking. In this case, you will not apply your emotions and you will not fall into the emotional trap. In the aptitude department of CLAT, about 35 to 29 questions are asked. We will now discuss the topics covered in the section on legal adequacy: Single Main Questions, which means that you can resolve a single client and one or more questions based on this principle. For example, you will receive a principle about cheating, as we will see later in this article, and you will receive one or more questions based on the same principle. Legal Aptitude for CLAT has now become an understanding-based aptitude test where questions are indirect and based on inference. The consortium prepares the questionnaire to logically challenge the students who take the exam.
CLAT Exam Legal Aptitude Scores: You will receive 50/200 questions for the Legal Aptitude section, each question has 1 point. The section covers issues based on legal reasoning, legal maxims, legal static G.K., current legal G.K. and important jurisdictions relevant to CLAT. Overall, this is a very high score section and you can easily get grades in this section. To become a contract, an agreement must create a legally enforceable legal obligation under the provisions of contract law. Any agreement that does not establish enforceability, i.e. where the parties do not have the right to appeal to the court for breach of contract, is not a contract. This manifests itself in the intention to enter into a legally binding contract that is different from a mere promise. The parties should be aware that if one of them does not fulfill their part of the promise, they will be held responsible for the failure of the contract. The consideration is described as a consideration. It is also crucial for the validity of the Treaty. A promise to do something or give something without consideration is legally unenforceable and therefore invalid.
The consideration does not need to be in kind or cash. A contract without consideration is a betting contract or bet. In addition, the consideration must also be lawful. It is not necessary for these principles to apply only to natural persons, but also to capital companies which are considered to be legal persons. Static legal knowledge, which means that no legal reasoning is required and you need to know some principles and concepts or basic legal terminology in advance to resolve this section. It also includes knowledge of legal maxims, legal words that are important for a lawyer to use in the courtroom or in practice. Try to answer these questions to test your legal reasoning skills and level of readiness. Let`s get started – there are different law entrance exams you can take to start your legal career at prestigious colleges, but the most sought-after legal exam is CLAT (Common Law Admission Test), which is conducted for 21+ national law schools. Apart from CLAT, there are other important examinations such as AILET, i.e. All India Law Entrance Test, which is conducted by the National University of Law, Delhi. Apart from these other exams, these could be the LSAT (it is conducted by Jindal Global Law School) and the SET (which is conducted by Symbiosis Law School). These are the exams alongside CLAT and the traditional 3-year postgraduate exams, e.g.
D.U.L.L.B, for which you may seem to start your career in law. There are several basics in the different sections of CLAT that you need to keep in mind in order to build a solid foundation for a good score in all these exams.