If you`re thinking about submitting in other countries, keep your idea a secret. In most European and Asian countries (“absolute novelty”), there is no grace period. However, European countries have an exception that allows you to obtain a patent if the public disclosure was made without your consent. In this case, you have a six-month grace period to submit. Another obstacle to the realization of the novelty part of a patent concerns its usefulness. Quite simply, this principle separates the practice from the abstract or the aesthetic. A perpetual motion machine, for example, has no practical use and is therefore not patentable. However, something that produces useful results in any type of industry, including agriculture, is a novel idea and could be patentable. The novelty point is a term used in patent law to distinguish elements or limitations of a claim that are conventional or known from elements or limitations that are new, i.e. unconventional or known.
[ref. needed] This part of the invention can also be called “starting point of the prior art”. [ref. needed] The term is also applied to a patentability test – the novelty examination point – which determines patentability (usually obviousness) by taking into account the novelty point(s) after the disassembly of the conventional part. To obtain a patent, an invention cannot be obvious to either an industry professional or non-experts. The “contribution” approach in European patent law is similar to the US “novelty point” approach. It is supposed to be invalid, but it is still applied under different masks to avoid counterintuitive results. If you need help determining the novelty of your patent application, you can post your question or concern on the UpCounsel marketplace. UpCounsel only accepts the top 5% of lawyers on its website.
UpCounsel lawyers come from law schools such as Harvard Law and Yale Law and have an average of 14 years of legal experience, including working with or on behalf of companies such as Google, Menlo Ventures, and Airbnb. Local novelty in patent law means that an invention is new if it has not been used or published in the relevant jurisdiction. Today, U.S. patent law still recognizes that parts of a patent claim may constitute “trivial post-resolution activity.” This is considered a kind of “novelty point” approach, which is not allowed by current patent law (federal circuit). To combat counterfeiting, truly “insignificant” elements are systematically kept out of patent claims.  However, the purpose of the patent law doctrine with respect to trivial post-settlement activities is that the addition of such restrictions to a claim does not mean the addition of an “inventive concept” to the otherwise impermissible underlying idea.  The obvious is not always easy to spot, and many inventors unconsciously reject their idea. Printed notes and suggestions that allow others to easily come up with the same idea can make the invention obvious. For example, an article may explain a specific problem and usually suggest a solution.
If your invention fits this description, it will be considered obvious, especially if the publication is a publication that others in your field are likely to read. Japan is also a country of absolute novelty, but recently an exception to patent law has been added. This allows you to file a patent application within six months of the publication of an invention in printed form or by any form of electronic communication. When the inventor learns to patent an idea, he must consider novelty, which is one of the three standards that an invention must meet to be considered patentable by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. There are still gaps in compliance with the novelty standard, and each case will be reviewed by the U.S. Patent Office. Before filing a patent, check if there is a prior art similar to your invention.
If so, be prepared to explain why your invention is new and different enough to be patented. Inventors can also consider a preliminary patent, which is a quick and relatively inexpensive way to start the patent process, making it easier for the inventor to file in front of their competitors. Since a patent gives a person the right to an invention, patent protection is necessary for an inventor. Without patent protection, competitors can take the idea and make it their own. When this happens, there are no legal actions an inventor can take. To obtain a new status and not be prior art, an idea must: In Canada, novelty requirements are codified in section 28.2 of the Patent Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4): Under the European Patent Convention (EPC), European patents are granted for inventions which, inter alia, are new. The central legal provision for novelty in the EPC is Article 54 EPC. In a Jepson claim, the conventional parts of the elements of the claim are placed in a preamble, such as “In a grease gun comprising a cylinder containing a piston moving longitudinally in that cylinder, in which the cylinder has a nozzle at a distal end”, followed by a transitional sentence such as “the improvement includes” followed by a recitation of the element or elements, which form the point of novelty, such as “said nozzle with a fluted opening at a distal end thereof”.
[ref. needed] An objection to a patent or claim on the grounds that the invention is not new or original is called a “lack of novelty” objection. Accelerate all aspects of your legal work with tools that help you work faster and smarter. Win cases, close deals and grow your business, while saving time and minimizing risk.